Reeve
Run it free
Menu
ReeveField guideLeak taxonomy

Where home-care margin leaks: unbilled hours, EVV clawbacks, and rate mismatches.

Most of the margin an agency loses was not lost to bad service or bad pricing. It was lost to a timing gap, a billing mismatch, or a documentation problem that nobody caught in time. Once you know where to look, the pattern repeats across almost every operation.

01

The five places margin disappears

Authorized but unbilled hours. The most common leak is also the quietest. Care is scheduled, delivered, and paid to the caregiver, but the handoff from scheduling to billing never completes. There is no denial, no remittance line, no alert. The visit is fully recoverable if it is caught before the timely filing window closes; after that, the entitlement is gone.

Lapsed authorization windows. Authorizations have end dates. Visits keep flowing on the schedule after the end date because nothing on the calendar surfaces it. Every claim after the lapse denies. Some payers will grant a retroactive authorization if you move fast and document why service continued; most will not once you are past their window.

EVV gaps and clawback exposure. EVV has been mandatory under the 21st Century Cures Act. App failures, GPS drift, caregivers clocking from an unexpected location, and EMR-to-EVV sync mismatches all produce records that look non-compliant on audit. Some payers deny at submission, some pay and later recoup. The fix lives upstream in daily or weekly reconciliation, not at appeal.

Rate and modifier mismatches. Multi-tier contracts, live-in modifiers, program-specific codes, and payer fee-schedule updates all conspire to produce claims that either deny outright on the wrong code or, worse, pay silently below the contracted rate. Silent underpayments do not show up as denials, so they stay invisible until someone divides paid dollars by billed units and compares against the contract.

Denied claims left unworked. Few agencies work every denial in-window. Larger and newer denials get attention; smaller and older ones fall through. Once the appeal window closes, the money is not recoverable at any price. A denial log with nothing in the last 60 days is usually not clean, it is usually abandoned.

02

Why these persist even in well-run agencies

None of these leaks require bad intent or bad staff. They are structural. Authorizations live in one system, EVV in another, claims in a third, and remittances in a fourth. The only place they meet is on a reconciliation that nobody owns end to end. In benchmark industry commentary, unbilled care and unworked denials often account for a meaningful share of net revenue lost, and the gaps compound quietly month over month.

03

What to do right now

  1. 01
    Pull a 90-day snapshot
    Authorizations, EVV visits, claims and remittances

    One quarter is enough to see the pattern. Export authorizations, EVV visit detail, and claims plus remittances for the same window.

  2. 02
    Compare at line level
    Authorizations with visits but no claim

    Any authorized, delivered visit with no matching claim is a candidate for recovery. Sort by filing deadline first.

  3. 03
    Isolate the last week before lapse
    Visits within seven days of an auth end date

    That window catches the majority of authorization-drift denials before they harden.

  4. 04
    Age your denials
    Denials over 60 days old, unreworked

    If the appeal window is still open, work them. If it is closed, log the reason so it stops repeating.

Questions

Plain answers, on the record.

Unbilled authorized hours, lapsed authorization windows, EVV gaps and clawback exposure, rate and modifier mismatches, and denied claims left unworked.

They produce no remittance line and no denial. Standard AR reports show only claims that were submitted, so an authorized visit that never became a claim never surfaces.

A payer pays a claim, then later recoups the payment because the underlying EVV record fails an audit. Reconciling EVV to claims weekly is the practical defense.

Pull a 90-day snapshot of authorizations, EVV visits, and claims. Compare them at line level and sort by filing and appeal deadlines.

Two lanes, priced separately

Collect is money you never captured. Cover is money a payer can still take back.

Reeve reports the two separately and never adds them together, because only one of them is yours to go and get. The Margin Review reads both on your own export and costs nothing.

Margin Review
Free

One pass over your own export, in your browser. The findings are yours to keep, with no obligation.

Collect
$750 per branch per month

The recovery lane. Care you delivered and never billed, units short of what was authorized, lines paid under the published rate.

Cover
$1,000 per branch per month

Everything in Collect, plus the exposure lane. Retired codes, authorizations at the end of their period, care delivered past what was approved.

Month to month, no annual contract. Read-only in every tier. Run the free review.

Start with a Margin Review

Find your leaks in a closed month.

The review takes your exports and prints the five leak types back to you as ranked dollars with deadlines attached. Free, in your browser, read only.